|
|
  
 
Subject:
Re: Odometer question
From: "Dad" <knockers(at)fish.net>
Subject: Re: Odometer question
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:10:59 -0400
Lines: 61
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.201.40.14
________________________________________________
"CardsFan" <me(at)here.com> wrote in message
news:cee8hp$l6a$1(at)mozo.cc.purdue.edu...
>
> "Dad" <knockers(at)fish.net> wrote in message
> news:lMKdnYbfndYLGZfcRVn-qQ(at)bright.net...
> >
> > > >
> > Snip
> > > > else for a bad buying decision. Nobody is responsible for what they
do
> > > > anymore.
> > >
> > > Your last statement is as inaccurate as mine was about vehicle damage.
> > Not
> > > everyone is a car expert. There are a lot of disreputable people and
> > > dealers. The things I mentioned are cheap insurance.
> > >
> > > AJM
> > > `93 Ruby coupe, 6 sp
> > >
> > Sorry your opinion is inaccurate, have you been in court lately. I took
a
> > jerk to court to prove he was at fault while he was driving his car and
> > damage it. I didn`t win but I got it settled without to much cost and no
> way
> > for him to come back on me for the total damages. My last statement
> stands,
> > the court decides that, you don`t. There are a lot of disreputable
people
> > buying cars also. Cheap insurance is just that, cheap, try to get a
> > settlement. Yes, there is something wrong with making money the
insurance
> > way.
>
> But your argument is circular. You`re deriding people for not taking
> responsibility for making good buying decisions But when they try to use
> methods available to avoid bad decisions, you deride that. People are
going
> to buy used cars, some out of necessity, and not every buyer knows enough
> about cars to make a good decision independently.
Snipped>
AJM
> `93 Ruby coupe, 6 sp
>
We disagree again, it`s not an argument, but just some more information to
allow someone to make a more informed decision. Yes, I will always look
poorly on people that won`t accept their reasonability for the decision they
make. If they were making good buying decisions everything is fine, if it
turns out bad, it isn`t their fault. That`s what I`m talking about, an adult
has to accept both the good and bad decision he makes. Not revel in the good
ones and blame someone for the bad ones.
--
Dad
04 C5 CE Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd
From: "RWDoyle" <generic(at)rwdoyle.removetomail.net>
Subject: Re: Odometer question
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:11:21 -0400
Lines: 19
________________________________________________
So, the answer to my question was "no, there is not a way to tell if the
odometer has surpassed its mechanical limit." hee hee
Seriously, thanks for the responses and the additional information.
Ryan
"Dad" <knockers(at)fish.net> wrote in message
news:KqGdnUF3PdvCNpfcRVn-jg(at)bright.net...
>
> "CardsFan" <me(at)here.com> wrote in message
> news:cee8hp$l6a$1(at)mozo.cc.purdue.edu...
> >
> > "Dad" <knockers(at)fish.net> wrote in message
> > news:lMKdnYbfndYLGZfcRVn-qQ(at)bright.net...
> >
> > Blah Blah argue argue
From: "Diode" <jeff(at)rsmail.com>
Subject: OE Quote Fix
Lines: 14
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 03:52:19 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.47.238.100
________________________________________________
Hobbes:
OEQF has some "interesting features". I have the newest version and it
interferes with spell checking and does some odd things with cursor
placement. Are you (or anyone else) experiencing similar problems?
--
-|>- Diode -<|-
`68 L79 Coupe
`79 Triumph Bonneville
NEXT POSTS:
| | |
